musings and ramblings from an independent conformist

05 August 2006

Requiem for a Rookie Card

"Worst turn of events...ever."

I used to have a retirement plan when I was 11. It was seemingly fool-proof, pragmatically structured around my possession of Emmitt Smith, Shaquille O'Neal, and Ken Griffey, Jr. rookie cards. Now I'm going to have to talk to Charles Schwab just like all those other schmucks. What a sad state of affairs...

At least I've still got my Nolan Ryans and Mattinglys to keep me company.


Requiem for a Rookie Card

06 July 2006

Javanated Summer Reading

RELEVANT had a great caption to this year's summer reading list (issue #21) : "If you're only going to read one book this summer, that's just really sad."

Very true...

I'm a big fan of suggested summer reading, and summer reading lists indulge two of my favorite hobbies - namely, reading and lists. Great stuff. However, I have to concede that summer reading lists aren't quite as good as they used to be. That's because summer reading in the grown-up world is a little like winter reading in the grown-up world - or even fall reading or spring reading, for that matter - seeing as how "summer break" has been effectively shortened to just plain "summer" and is thus rendered into something a little like any other time or season of the year (8:30 to 5:00, five days a week), except a whole lot hotter and with more fireworks and ice cream.

But even if your literary activity has been relegated to something that just happens every once in a while on the weekends, summer is still a great time to drop by your local bookstore and pick up a few choice items. Think of it as a three-month trial period. Maybe you want to have a crack at sci-fi or short stories or some other genre you haven't read before. Maybe you want to spend June, July, and August studying one particular author (like my infamous 2004 "Summer of C.S. Lewis" or this year's bardic follow-up, "Summer of Shakespeare." Ok, yeah, so I'm a dork...). Give it a try and see what you think (and no, watching Reading Rainbow doesn't count). It'll be sort of like one of those corn flake commercials, except I'm not going to offer you your money back if you don't like it.

Here, then, to help you along is javanated's own suggested summer reading list - 25 of my favorite reads from summers past and present. Go ahead, knock yourself out.


Things Fall Apart
Chinua Achebe

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Douglas Adams

Winesburg, Ohio
Sherwood Anderson

Henderson the Rain King
Saul Bellow

Pilgrim at Tinker Creek
Annie Dillard

Notes From The Underground
Fyodor Dostoevsky

Kill Two Birds and Get Stoned
Kinky Friedman

Faust
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

The Power and the Glory
Graham Greene

For Whom the Bell Tolls
Ernest Hemingway

Steppenwolf
Herman Hesse

High Fidelity
Nick Hornby

The Unbearable Likeness of Being
Milan Kundera

The Great Divorce
C.S. Lewis

The Screwtape Letters
C.S. Lewis

Till We Have Faces
C.S. Lewis

One Hundred Years of Solitude
Gabriel Garcia Marquez

Blue Like Jazz
Donald Miller

1984
George Orwell

As You Like It
William Shakespeare

The Taming of the Shrew
William Shakespeare

The Tempest
William Shakespeare

The Hobbit
J.R.R. Tolkien

Confederacy of Dunces
John Kennedy Toole

Slaughterhouse Five
Kurt Vonnegut


Feel free to comment with your own suggested summer/fall/winter/spring reading lists.

Sufjan Stevens and Christian Music

Q: what makes Christian music "Christian"?
A: You might be surprised.

There was a very thought-provoking article from Reuters last summer about the relationship between Sufjan Stevens and the Christian Music Industry, one that I've been trying to locate online for a while now. It appears that the news story has long been deleted (neither the AP or Reuters offer in-depth online archives of their news stories - at least none that I could find), but I was able to locate another blog that made mention of the story and commented on some of the issues contained within. Suggested reading for anyone who is interested in these types of things.

Here is the link.

04 July 2006

4th of July Ramblings: Trying to Make Sense of Religious and Political Confusion, or Why I Feel A Little More Patriotic Today

Yesterday I had lunch with a group of close friends, including J. and C., who recently returned from spending several weeks in Guatemala. J. mentioned that while abroad they had been continuously questioned by the locals and other foreigners they met about US government and policies – “what do you think about Bush?,” “why does the US waste so much energy?,” “why do they not buy energy from Guatemala?,” etc., etc.

J. told us it was difficult not to be defensive about the questions. She wanted to tell them that she wasn’t part of the government, she didn’t decide domestic or foreign policy, she didn’t have breakfast each morning with the president. But the more she thought about the situation, the more she realized that the foreigners weren’t mad at her personally - they were simply frustrated with some of her country’s decisions, just as they were frustrated with some of their own country’s decisions. They weren’t accusing her. Instead, her citizenship offered them an opportunity to vent their feelings about a situation they themselves had no control over, likely in hopes that maybe she could do something to change it. She likened it to the “Confession Booth” chapter in Blue Like Jazz, where Miller and some of his friends set up a booth at a university festival to apologize to students about the many things that the Christian church had done to hurt and wrong people, and said that she began to see herself in some ways as a representative of the United States, apologizing to the people she met for some of the ways our government (past and present) has acted and some of the policies we have adopted at others’ expense. She knew that not all of the accusations were fair or justified, but, nonetheless, that there was a need for those who spoke them to share them all the same. A cathartic process, in some ways.

* * *

For a long time now I haven’t known quite what to think about my country. When I was 17, my family took a trip to England, and it was there that I fully realized for the first time my national identity. My heritage was important, my European ancestry something fascinating, but it did not define me. I was an American. I talked like an American, dressed like an American, ate like an American, thought like an American. I was old enough to know that my country wasn’t perfect or always in the right, but I was proud of our ideals and some of the things for which we had fought. And for a while, I was content with this conception of my home and nation.

Fast forward to 2001.

In the aftermath of 9/11, we were bombarded with frenzied nationalistic sentiment. Quickly we moved from grieving, honoring, and being proud of our country’s response to tragedy into a modern enactment of 50’s era McCarthyism, whereby in many circumstances, if you were not ultra-patriotic or of certain ethnic descents, you were suspected (even in the slightest degree) of terrorist leanings or activities. If you were not with us, we loudly proclaimed to our own and to the world, you were against us. Paranoia held us in a tight grip, and in the absence of an easily definable enemy (a terrorist cell or network is not as concrete an adversary as another country) we attempted to bring order to chaos by establishing our own system of black and white “logic”: 'America is based on good and just principles. Our way of life is the best. Our system of government is the best. Those who disagree with us oppose us. Ergo, those who disagree with our government or way of life oppose that which is good and just.'

And in the Christian community, nationalism became synonymous with spiritual maturity. If you were to be a good Christian, you must be a good and patriotic American. And to be a good American meant to be a good Christian. Because we were wronged, God was on our side, and whatever we did, we did in His name and by His approval. Or so we believed. Working in a Christian bookstore, I watched truckloads and truckloads fill our store with quasi-religious American kitsch. Paintings of bald eagles and the Stars and Stripes, emblazoned with patriotic lyrics and out-of-context scripture references. Bookmarks and stickers depicting Uncle Sam kneeling at a cross. Pictures of crosses draped in American flags, stone decorative crosses etched with patriotic designs and the lyrics to “God Bless America.” In the hands of a few marketers and profiteers, my Savior had been reduced to little more than the spokesperson for nationalistic propaganda. I questioned this. I quietly voiced my concern. And when my relationship with God was then called into question, I quietly resigned in disgust. I found myself embarrassed about being identified as a Christian, embarrassed about being identified as an American.

* * *

In retrospect, going through this process taught me some valuable lessons, especially in regards to my faith. There are lots of things, I decided, that are of secondary, tertiary, or even no importance that get elevated into central positions by people inside the Church. I know lots of good Christians who smoke; lots of good Christians who drink; lots of good Christians who listen to “secular” music; lots of good Christians who don’t like praise and worship music; lots of good Christians who don’t like ritual; lots of good Christians who vote Democrat; lots of good Christians who aren’t particularly patriotic.

These things, and many like them, don’t really matter that much in the grand scheme of things. They’re a little like bill riders and pork barrel spending; they are not central to Christianity or the message of Christ. You don't have to accept them to accept His grace. They neither accurately nor inaccurately reflect someone’s relationship with God or their status as a “good” or “bad” person of faith. The bottom line is that there are many different kinds of Christians, a lot of things that get attached Christianity that are really “up in the air,” and we don’t all have to agree about them or believe exactly the same way to be considered Christians or to love one another. (I understand that not everyone will agree with this paragraph.) Love, after all, does not equate with endorsement.

At the same time, though, it’s important for us to remember that we are part of a group of believers that has gotten a lot of things wrong (and continues to still get a lot of things wrong – to err is human, and frustrating as it is sometimes, I am continually reminded that the church is full of (and for) human beings). Just as with Miller’s “Confession Booth,” we should never see ourselves as completely inculpable or too proud to apologize and ask forgiveness from others for the many hurts and pains our faith has caused, whether we are the direct culprits or not.

By the same token, just because we as Christians have gotten it wrong doesn’t change the ideals or the message or what is true. Those things, the things that I believe Christianity to be essentially about, haven’t changed and won’t, regardless of how many times we sin and screw up.

* * *

Which brings me back to J.'s parallel between religion and country. It seems odd that until yesterday, I had never found a way to reconcile my feelings about my nation in a similar manner to what I had with my faith. About Christianity, I had realized that there were many aspects that I could disagree with and still “keep my faith” – they were inconsequential. For whatever reason, I had never turned this line of thinking towards the United States, and yet it’s just as applicable. Consequently, today is the first 4th of July in many years that I’ve felt like celebrating.

Over the past day and a half, I’ve begun to realize that being an American doesn’t mean that I have to like the arrogance or bad sportsmanship we see in domestic or international sports. It doesn’t mean I have to like wasting energy or natural resources. It doesn’t that I have to like the greed and corruption displayed in certain sectors of the corporate world. It doesn’t mean that I have to like every conflict or military operation my country takes part in. It doesn’t mean that I have to like my faith being co-opted by some segments of my government.

Those things, among others, do not comprise the core of what I believe this nation to be about. For me, America is about freedom. It is about having choices and opportunities. It is about helping others and trying to better the world around me. It is about having a say in what I do and how I live. It is about celebrating and accepting the uniqueness of groups, individuals, ethnicities, faiths, and races. It is about being able to disagree, being able to have my own opinion, and having rights that cannot be taken away. It is about recognizing worth in every person, no matter how “important” or “unimportant.” Those are things that I can believe in. Those are things that I can be proud about.

That doesn’t mean that we don’t do a lot of things wrong or badly or that we don’t take our ideals to damaging and dangerous extremes. It doesn’t mean that we’ve fully realized our own ideals in this country. It doesn’t mean that we’re immune to corruption, that we’re always right and just or that our motives are always pure.

And for that, I offer my apologies as an American citizen. We have a lot to be apologetic for. We are a nation of human beings, and, as Alexander Hamilton reminds us, men are not angels. We always have and always will have room for improvement, and I will never completely defend our policies, our decisions, or our methods. But I will defend the ideals upon which this nation was founded. I will defend the freedom and liberty for which we are gathered together as different states, groups, and unique peoples.

On this Fourth of July, I hope that we as a country might never lose sight of these principles and ideals, never forget what it is we truly stand for. As we strive to better protect our own rights, may we not deny the rights of others. May we never forget that we are but one nation in a world of many nations, and that the rest of the world is watching. May we never forget why and for what we celebrate.

Happy 4th of July.

29 June 2006

Round of 8 Eve: Another Javanated World Cup Update

The World Cup Round of 8 kicks off tomorrow morning, which means it’s time for another Javanated World Cup Update. A "Cupdate," if you will. Not to be confused with "Cupcake," which, while still very tasty, is ultimately not as satisfying.

A recap of Homelander results:

United States. Man, this was painful. So painful, in fact, that I count myself fortunate that I never actually managed to see any of the US games. A couple of Saturdays ago, I had an opportunity to watch the Italy-US game but opted to go see Nacho Libre instead. I still feel like I made the right choice (“get that corn out of my face!”). I can’t say that I was sorely disappointed in the United States’ performance, but I was hoping for at least a win and a couple of goals. A respectable show, in other words. Instead we came away with one point, one goal of our own, and an Italian charity point. What might surprise everyone to know is that the US came into the tournament ranked number 5 in the world, which means that we wound up a pretty major disappointment. But on the other hand, the Czech Republic, who many (including myself) had thought might challenge for the title, came into the tournament ranked number 2. In the Czech’s defense, it’s hard to win when your two best strikers are out injured. But what it goes to show is that when you get down to it, rankings really don’t mean squat. We’ve got a lot of work cut out for us in the next 4 years. But a new coach might be a good start.

Switzerland. La Suisse! Switzerland had a young team and surprised a lot of people by winning their Group and making it to the Round of 16. Swiss defender Philipp Degen even made ESPN Soccernet’s Team of the Departed, with Senderos and Barnetta garnering honorable mentions. Switzerland departed the tournament at the hands of Ukraine in penalty kicks in what the Gamecast commentator said was perhaps the worst and most boring game he’s ever watched. Obviously that’s a little harsh, but soccer commentators are notorious for exaggeration and bluntness. I watched part of the first half on Univision during my lunch break (not having cable sometimes forces you to expand your cultural horizons during the World Cup), though, so the Spanish commentators might have very well been saying the same thing, but I didn’t think the game was THAT bad. Speaking of Univision, I have learned to pick out a few key phrases that seem to pop up in every game – “Si,Si,” “No se puede,” “Fuego!,” and “Falta!,” but unfortunately this hasn’t translated into any greater sense of fluency with the Spanish language. (FYI: Univision broadcasts ALL of the World Cup games, so if you don’t have ESPN, just flip over to the Spanish channel and knock yourself out.) I keep hoping that something will happen to me where all of a sudden I mysteriously know what’s going on (ala Antonio Banderas in 13th Warrior) but no such luck. There are still plenty of World Cup games left, so I haven’t given up completely. And, in a strange way, there’s something vaguely comforting about watching 2 hours of television and not having a clue about what any of it means.

Germany. Germany was the runner up in the 2002 World Cup (losing to Brazil) and haven’t shown any signs of slowing down in this year’s tournament. Of course, home field advantage really helps. They made meatballs of Sweden in the first few minutes of that game (yeah, I know, that was really bad – my apologies to Freddie Ljunberg) and coasted the rest of the way to earn a spot in the third round. They are going to be tough to beat. Germany resumes play tomorrow against Argentina, who won a classic game against Mexico to advance. Rodriguez’s goal at the end of that one was easily the most beautiful / amazing goal that I have ever seen in the World Cup (the ball didn’t even touch the ground!), a goal that you never get tired watching replays of. If you haven’t seen it yet (or even if you have), I highly recommend you head to the FIFA World Cup website and check out the video of that goal. The coolest thing about that goal was that I was able to watch it happen live on Univision, and hearing an announcer yell “Gol!” repeatedly at the top of his lungs is seriously one of the best moments in televised sports. I suggest you try it sometime. Argentina’s got a really good team with lots of depth, but I think the home field gives Germany the edge.

France. After a slow start, the honorary Homelanders have been heating up, and Zidane put on a clinic in their Round of 16 game over Spain. Next up for Henry (a.k.a. “The Man”) and the rest of the team is a showdown Saturday against Brazil. Although Ronaldo has figured out how to put the ball in the net again, it’s been widely acknowledged that the team hasn’t been playing up to Brazilian fans’ expectations of “sexy football” – whatever that means. I just know that despite a lot of goals, Brazil hasn’t been playing up to their full potential, and that’s a scary thought. Winning isn’t good enough for them; they want to do it with grace, style, and fun. Pizazz. You have to respect that approach, and it’s hard not to like Brazil, even if they do win all the time. With the team faltering somewhat (by their own standards), it’s possible that a focused French team might be able to pull the upset, but it will be difficult.

Which brings us to England. In some ways they have been very similar to Brazil – lots of good players, an undefeated record, but an unimpressive showing, so far. In fact, except for some moments here and there, they really haven’t looked that good at all. However, they’ve showed some old-fashioned British grit and determination (why in the world did the television crew decide they had to show us pictures of Beckham blowing chunks against Ecuador?) and have gotten the job done. Rooney is really starting to look good, the defense has been solid, and Beckham’s free kick has been the #2 highlight of the tournament for me (behind Rodriguez’s goal for Argentina). It’s been hard rooting for the Chelsea players (I freakin’ hate Chelsea), but I have to remind myself it’s all for a good cause. England’s next match is Saturday morning (on ABC) against Portugal, who won a very dirty game against the Netherlands. From what I understand, the English team and, more importantly, the FIFA referees have been well-briefed on what to watch out for in the game. Luckily, the English games have been (relatively) well-called thus far, and one of their opponent’s best players (Deco), is suspended from the match. Here’s hoping the Brits can put together a solid effort against the “tricksy Portugueses.”


Here are my predictions for the rest of the tournament. Not necessarily what I want to see happen, mind you, but what I think probably will.


Javanated World Cup Predictions

Germany vs. Argentina (Fri)
= Germany

Italy vs. Ukraine (Fri)
= Italy (“the Ukraine is weak!”)

England vs. Portugal (Sat)
= England

Brazil vs. France (Sat)
= Brazil

Germany vs. Italy (Tues, July 4)
= Germany

England vs. Brazil (Wed, July 5)
= Brazil

England vs. Italy (Sat, July 8)
= England

Germany vs. Brazil (Sun, July 9)
= Germany, in a rematch of the 2002 Finals


But as I said earlier, rankings and predictions don’t mean a thing when it’s game time. Personally, I would love to see an England vs. France showdown on the 5th and an England vs. Germany final on the 9th. We’ll see what happens.

Oh, and for you working stiffs like myself, don’t forget about the ESPN Gamecasts - they’re a real life saver. You can keep tabs on the game and still do your job, and the best part is that you get to look like a complete idiot yelling “yes!” and thrusting your outstretched arms in the air while your colleagues look at you from their computers and quietly wonder if they need to call an ambulance for you. But then again, being an idiot is what soccer is all about, right? Right.

Until next time, or, as they say on Univision, hasta luego. Si, Si!

15 June 2006

Butterflies

Check out this very interesting article, courtesy of the King of Twist. Major kudos for digging this one up. Incredible.

Javanated World Cup Update

Day 7 of the World Cup, and for the most part, the Homelanders have been doing well.

England plays again this morning, confronting a feisty Trinidad and Tobago team that held Sweden to a scoreless draw this past Saturday. The Brits won their first game against Paraguay, with a shot from David Beckham that lent new meaning to the words "in your face!" (I can't help but laugh every time I watch the highlights.) One of my favorite writers, Nick Hornby has a wonderful essay about the English national team here, courtesy of National Geographic. A win today will put them into the second round.

The Germans won their first two games over Costa Rica and Poland and can sit a little more comfortably in their game against Ecuador after having already earned their way into the next stage of the tournament. As Hornby so poetically notes, England and Germany don't like each other. The English, he writes, would "still prefer to be bombing the Germans; but after sixty years, there's a slowly dawning suspicion that those days aren't coming back any time soon." Nothing like two world wars to make international sports a little more interesting. The nice thing about living in the US is that I can root for both countries - or most any other team for that matter - without feeling any qualms about it. Both teams are good, neither like Iran, and that's good enough for me.

Switzerland and honorary Homelander France played to a nil-nil draw earlier in the week. In the words of my friend Jude, the French "owned them," but couldn't find the net to make it count. Cheering for both, I was happy with the draw, but I would have liked to see a few goals in the process. With two teams making it from each group, here's hoping that the Swiss and French can pick up wins against Korea and Togo to make it out of first round play together.

And that brings us to the Americans. My country 'tis of thee, but my country 'tis sucked against the Czech Republic. That they would lose was pretty much a foregone conclusion (The Czechs are a heavy favorite to win the whole tournament), but that they would do it so pitifully was a little disappointing. We play Italy on Saturday afternoon and need to win if we are to make it out of group play, especially after getting blanked in our first game and having no goals to show for ourselves in case of a tie-break situation. A win against Italy would be the biggest win in American soccer history. A loss would spell an early return back to the US of A.

I can't really say that I'm too upset that the Americans aren't really all that good in soccer. After all, we're good in pretty much everything else (with the motto of, "if you can't win, just throw more money at it until you do") and it's good to be humbled now and again by our international neighbors. Sometimes I think the only thing that stops us from being bombed by Mexico is the fact that they consistently have a better soccer team than we do.

I am slightly worried, though, that a bad showing by the US in this year’s World Cup could mean that the few people here in the States who are interested enough to follow the team will lose interest in the sport altogether, flipping channels on the cultural remote with a shrug of the shoulders and a sour retort of, “Stupid soccer, I didn’t really care anyway… What time does Survivor come on?” Can America really care about something it’s not good at? Something tells me no. I hope I’m wrong.

P.S. In case you don't have cable tv, or missed some of the games, the FIFA World Cup website is pretty fantastic. I'm lovin' it (duh duh dut dut duh). Just click on the videos link and catch all of the highlights for the games thus far. Some of them are nothing short of amazing. The Beautiful Game at its best.



*** Update ***
And there was much rejoicing! England has just made it into the round of 16 with a 2-0 win over Trinidad and Tobago. Goals by Peter Crouch and Steven Gerrard, and an appearance in the second half by Wayne Rooney. Hooray for Liverpudlians!